Desert Store Weather Desert Talk Desert Life Things to Do Places to Go What's New Home Community

DesertUSA has a new message board.
Please register to post there if you have not already done so.

Forum: Desert Environmental and Land Use Issues | Forums | Topics |
Author
Topic: Proposed Solar Projects
LoneRanger

March 27, 2008
6:11 P.M.

Under review is an application to develop 21 square miles of Lucerne Valley into rows of solar panels:

"The Cannon Power Corp. in Rancho Santa Fe submitted an application last month to the Bureau of Land Management to construct photovoltaic panels in the Lucerne Valley Dry Lake bed, according to Bureau of Land Management documents.

Two of the largest proposed solar projects, one for 59 square miles and another for 82 square miles, could be built in Ward Valley, north of Twentynine Palms, according to BLM documents. The applications to construct solar projects of 20 square miles or more exceeds the number of wind power projects of the same size, documents show.

The projects have environmental consequences and their sheer size means less land will be left for other uses, such as hiking and ranching."

http://www.sbsun.com/sanbernardino/ci_8686798

LoneRanger

March 27, 2008
6:13 P.M.

Sorry, Ken. I knew I had seen this somewhere before and just realized that you already posted it.

LR

Ken

March 27, 2008
7:10 P.M.

LR you are still my DUSA friend but thanks. I hope you help us fight this.

In 2007, Cannon established its solar project division, Cannon Solar Partners, LLC. Today, Cannon is concentrating on the U.S. and selected European markets, where it has over 3,000 MW of wind and solar projects in various stages of development in the Western United States, Mexico, and Europe.

Lucerne Valley, California Solar Projects

(North and South), Two Locations +1,000 MW The permitting is in progress and Cannon’s development plan is to utilize concentrated solar photovoltaic technology.These projects, located in San Bernardino County in a very high quality solar resource area, are being developed by Cannon Solar Partners, LLC, Cannon’s solar development entity.

These are open area for everyone so we all loose.

Lucerne Valley remains a "crossroads" between Apple Valley, Barstow, Big Bear and the Eastern High Desert area of Yucca Valley and Morongo Valley,

Johnson Valley is a popular off-road vehicle recreation site known for its steep, rocky mountains and several dry lakes.

Lucerne Dry Lake is a popular spot for launching model rockets and is home to several model-rocket clubs.

Lucerne Valley is also open to amateur mining in the surrounding hills where mainly quartz, topaz and jasper can be found.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucerne_Valley,_California

Ken

March 27, 2008
7:17 P.M.

13,000 acres, 2,000 structures, 300 feet tall by 500 feet wide... Where's the Sierra Club?

http://vote29.com/drupal/?q=node/212

Dan

March 27, 2008
9:16 P.M.

LoneRanger: "Sorry, Ken. I knew I had seen this somewhere before and just realized that you already posted it."

You wouldn't be a little too focused on attempting to belittle ME would you?

Naaah!

LoneRanger

March 28, 2008
09:04 A.M.

Sorry my attention wandered, Dan. I'll mske a better effort to stay focused on YOU.

:-)

Sandman

March 28, 2008
09:58 A.M.

Now this is what we're talking about. This project utilizes rooftops in urban settings for large scale power generation.

"On a sunbathed warehouse rooftop in Fontana, Southern California Edison officials Thursday said they plan to launch the world's largest solar cell project.

By placing panels of photovoltaic cells on a sea of warehouses in Inland Southern California, the utility intends to produce 250 megawatts of electricity, enough to serve the power needs of about 162,000 homes"

Follow the link to read more about it ...........

http://www.pe.com/business/local/stories/PE_Biz_D_prologis28.33d7ac2.html

LoneRanger

March 28, 2008
10:10 A.M.

It's big business to convince consumers that the sun only shines in the desert.

LR

Ken

March 28, 2008
10:59 A.M.

Excellent article Sandman. This is the solution to saving Lucerne Valley

desertspawn

March 30, 2008
2:08 P.M.

WOW... 300X500 foot solar panels on stalks. How are they going to anchor something that large to the ground in the desert windstorms? with a surface area bigger than a football field it will be hard. Also how will they prevent dust fouling and vandalizing of the huge panels? I can just imagine what the panels will look like and how well they will function after a few years of sandblasting by the Santa Anna winds and potshots by the local rednecks and stoners. I agree with the idea of every flat roofed building being covered with panels being more realistic. You could put up a lot of panels for just the cost of 300 miles of transmission lines, poles and right of ways. plus most of the power will already be in the area it`s needed so no line losses. Any extra power could be used to convert water to hydrogen and O2 for cars,buses, etc and to power water desalinization for an ever thirstier So. Cal.

desertspawn

March 30, 2008
2:09 P.M.

WOW... 300X500 foot solar panels on stalks. How are they going to anchor something that large to the ground in the desert windstorms? with a surface area bigger than a football field it will be hard. Also how will they prevent dust fouling and vandalizing of the huge panels? I can just imagine what the panels will look like and how well they will function after a few years of sandblasting by the Santa Anna winds and potshots by the local rednecks and stoners. I agree with the idea of every flat roofed building being covered with panels being more realistic. You could put up a lot of panels for just the cost of 300 miles of transmission lines, poles and right of ways. plus most of the power will already be in the area it`s needed so no line losses. Any extra power could be used to convert water to hydrogen and O2 for cars,buses, etc and to power water desalinization for an ever thirstier So. Cal.

desertspawn

March 30, 2008
2:10 P.M.

OOPS!!! Sorry for the double post.... still new to this....lol

Sandman

March 30, 2008
6:13 P.M.

With advances in technolgy making solar power generation more cost effective and efficient, think of the possibilities if we utilized more rooftops and parking lots in urban settings.

Parking lots can be fitted with carport like structures holding solar panel arrays which not only generate electricity near the source of consumption, but also keep cars cool and out of the direct sunlight.

Pharo

March 30, 2008
7:32 P.M.

>>> think of the possibilities if we utilized more rooftops and parking lots in urban settings.<<<

I don't think anybody will let the power companies have the roof top for free. What kind of compensation would be offered? A discount on the electric bill or what?

Later,

PBiZ

Ken

March 30, 2008
10:31 P.M.

The power company leases the roof top. I would let them put it on my roof as long as they maintain my roof. Many people need roof maintenance

Sandman

March 31, 2008
08:34 A.M.

Property owners who install rooftop solar arrays can take advantage of tax rebates and all excess power generated goes back into the grid with a credit given upon the property owner's bill.

Dan

March 31, 2008
08:57 A.M.

I agree with Sandman. Additionally, with solar arrays covering more than the surface of the building's roof, there would be no need whatsoever for roof maintenance. It would never see direct sunlight, or rain. I also like the idea of parking lots with carport-like structures for additional solar arrays.

The obstacle here is the cost to fit these buildings and parking lots without a profit motive. If it's worthwhile to the building's owner, and there is a reasonable payback period, they will fit the buildings themselves.

I don't believe a wholesale government unfunded mandate is the solution. Tax credits can, and do help stimulate the demand, as they did with windmills. The only thing limiting windmills today, as a green source of energy, is the greens themselves, who don't want them in their "viewshed".

I can't imagine anyone having a problem with the placement of the solar panels themselves, on top of buildings or parking lots, unless we're talking about political action groups who can't find political advantage to them, and the utility companies who can't gain control of them.

Sandman

March 31, 2008
09:54 A.M.

"The only thing limiting windmills today, as a green source of energy, is the greens themselves, who don't want them in their "viewshed"."

They're kinda hard on migrating birds and raptors too!

Dan

March 31, 2008
10:17 A.M.

Sandman: "They're kinda hard on migrating birds and raptors too!"

Even some environmentalists (although not the radical sort in most instances) believe this is over-emphasized, and has become the rallying cry of people (The Kennedy clan among them) who just don't want them in their "viewshed". Likewise, nuclear energy is being embraced by some very practical environmental advocates as the most desirable power source of all.

If you listened to Dennis Prager last Friday, he hosted Gwyneth Cravens, who is a noted author and environmentalist, as well as a self-described liberal, who dispelled the myths about nuclear power which have been used to effectively suppress the use of that technology here in the US for decades. Her insight is really very interesting.

But first, here is an article regarding raptors and windmills.

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/04/common_misconce.php

Dan

March 31, 2008
10:23 A.M.

Here is another on Gwyneth Cravens and her activities on behalf of nuclear power. Whether you agree that humans create significant amounts of so-called "greenhouse gas" emissions or not, nuclear power has the potential to become the singular cleanest, least obtrusive, and most trouble-free form of power generation we have.

Solar, geothermal, and wind-generated power can't possibly satisfy the world's demand for inexpensive and clean power sources. Coal and fossil fuel-fired power plants have obvious disadvantages. The disadvantages to nuclear power plants are mostly contrived and designed to support a political outcome.

I think nuclear power is a great alternative.

Dan

April 1, 2008
10:32 P.M.

Did you know that the lifetime nuclear waste for a family of four has the potential to fit inside the space of a coffee cup?

Brian_A

April 2, 2008
04:56 A.M.

Nuclear is the solution. Power plants are much different today than in the past. The modern designs are pretty much melt down proof, even in the absense of any coolant. Also they are FAR more effecient. Modern nuclear ships and submarines NEVER need refueling. Past ships like the aircraft carrier Enterprise needed refueling every 8 years. Modern plants are drastically better.

Sal

April 2, 2008
06:23 A.M.

what do they do with the nuclear waste?

Dan

April 2, 2008
08:28 A.M.

Nuclear waste the size of a coffee cup can easily be encased in glass, lead, or concrete, and either buried or sunk to the bottom of the ocean.

Come to think of it, if there is to be no landfill at Eagle Mountain, that old open pit mine might be an ideal location for the nuclear waste for the next 1500 generations.

Thanks for the idea, Sal. See that? Even a blind squirrel comes up with an acorn once in a while.

Goldseeker

April 2, 2008
11:31 A.M.

Do you really think this world will last 1500 generations? They'll be damn lucky to last 1500 years.

Goldseeker

April 2, 2008
11:42 A.M.

"What do they do with the nuclear waste"? How about a nuclear waste landfill near Juniper Flats? According to 1 poster here, its no good anymore anyway since being overrun and ruined by ORV's?

Dan

April 2, 2008
11:44 A.M.

As a species, man is smart enough to last 1500 generations. Two problems:
1. We keep handing the reins of too much political power and policy decisions to the stupid people.
2. There is evil in this world, regardless of how 1/2 of our society refuses to believe that reality. We can also deal with that evil, except for #1 above.

Rules and Policies.


Message Board by Digital West Media Inc.