Hi,
I'm kinda new in this form, but have 36 years of field collecting and mineralogy experience. The triangle rock is of an igneous origin. The possible souce shown in the photo very much matches the triangle rock with the consistency of what appears to be a type of manganese deposition on a fissure, which is a weakness in the rock, which would be an easy point for the stone to be split off the face of the rock wall. The black is definitley no soot or growth - it is mineral deposition in a fracture in the rock.

Edgar Cayce died in 1945 and the years do not match with Barry Storm.

Hi Lin,

What dates are you having trouble matching up?

Best,

Jim

Hi, Jim,
I just came across this topic. In looking at Cayce's reading where he refers to time and then says there has been a great change in the appearance of the area due to the elements (of nature, I assume ), and characters wishing to hide something due to sacred feelings about the place, the first thoughts that came to mind were the earthquake which took place (in the 1880's, I believe), and the fact that both Waltz and the Apaches were said to have been responsible for covering up the mine. That would seem to explain what Cayce was referring to.
Bob

I agree Bob,

There was definitely something wrong with the information Cayce was given before the reading, and what he saw during the reading.

Best,

Jim

Everybody seems to misread the Cayce's reading. It states, a white triangle in the "hills". It describes to me a layer within the hills landscape, not a rock.

Hello timeofspace,

Quoting directly from what Cayce said:

"As we find, if we would locate this - from the present outlook:
We would go from the cactus marked here, in Canyon, some 5, 10, 20, 30, 37 1/2 yards to the north by west - north by west - to a place where, on the side of the hills, there is a white rock - almost pure white - almost as a triangle on top".

It sure sounds like he was talking about a ROCK to me.

Best,

Jim

I understand what you are saying, please step back and take the phase "of the hills". It is in plural form. A single rock can be found on any hill. The rock I speak of here has to be larger to acertain "hills". Just another way of looking at the puzzle.

I see what you're saying but I tend to agree with "a rock" meaning a rock and not a large, multi-hill formation. For comparison, I might say in the mountains over there there is a mine. That doesn't mean there are multiple mines or a mine that transects the mountains just because I used the plural form. It just means I didn't narrow down which mountain has the mine.