i-tsari-tsu-i wrote:
Wayne,
My own interest in the Pima had nothing really to do with the Superstitions, rather their involvement with the Jesuits in Sonora.
Trying to tie any of the local tribes into Spanish mines or treasure is where things will git a little thin.
The title of this topic is, "Native American history within the Superstitions discussion". Where would you like to see the discussion go from here? The major tribe to talk about, in the correct era for Spanish/Dutchman mines, would be the Yavapai and to a somewhat lesser degree, the Tonto Apache.
Take care,
Joe
Joe:
It's not really my call, or yours, as to where this discussion may lead.
cubfan64 wrote:
Legends, stories, facts, etc...
There have been a couple conversations started about Native American (specifically Apache) history within the Superstition Mountains. It seems as though it might deserve it's own thread here. I'm not sure if I can move the posts which were started elsewhere to here, but if I can I will.
If not however, please feel free to carry on whatever discussions, stories, etc... that suit the subject heading.
Personally I look forward to hearing what some of you folks can pass along - it's a fascinating area and history that for the most part is unknown to most people.
In my opinion, this topic should include
any "Legends, stories, facts, etc..." which may relate to the
history of Native Americans in the Sups.
I don't think it was Paul's intention to limit the scope of the topic to the Yavapai and Tonto Apache,or to the Spanish/Dutchman time frame. If I am mistaken, he can let us know.
I had assumed your quote of my post, originally from a different thread in another topic entirely, and your invitation to reply, indicated that you wished to discuss the history of
Pima's in the Superstitions.
Of course, I could have been wrong in that assumption.
i-tsari-tsu-i wrote:
Wayne,
You wrote:
[Alan:
The Pima were allies and frequently converts of the Jesuits. They also knew the Superstitions as well as, and maybe even better than both Apache and Yavapai,having gathered it's resources for centuries prior to the arrival of either group. The US army, in it's battles against the Apache/Yavapai in the area,including the Sups, were usually accompanied by Pima/Maricopa guides and warriors,and later by Apache scouts as well. It's likely that Pima would have performed the same service for any Jesuit group venturing north of the Gila. They welcomed any chance to seek revenge on their enemies, the Apache and the Yavapai, who first arrived in the area north of Prescott around 1300 AD settling among the Pai people,and spread southward some time after a split occurred within the group sometime around 1750.(Hoxie, p.456)
It was the Wiikchasapaya clan of the Kwevikopaya (Southern Yavapai) who periodically inhabited the land along the Apache Trail .Few in number,the largest village known was Ananyiké (quail's roost),a summer encampment of about 100 near Fish Creek.
There's much more information within this wikpedia entry,including references and links to further reading....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yavapai_pe ... te_note-15
Regards:SH.]
I don't believe there is any historical/archaeological record of the Pima's living in the Superstitions. They say that they have lived
around or near the Supe's.
If, as you say, they lived in the mountains before the Apache (Tonto) or the Yavapais even arrived in the area, they would hardly have any remembered memories of the exact terrain of the interior.
If possible, the army would use Native Americans who were familiar with the area for scouts. In the Apache wars, they often use the Apache. They, as well as the Pima, may have never even been in the area they were going into. Their value was in knowing the enemy and
what to look for.
I am open to hearing from other sources. This is, basically, just my
opinion based on what I have heard and read.
Take care,
Joe
It's just a suggestion, but if you do prefer a discussion limited to the
history of the Yavapai and Tonto Apache relationship with the Spanish/Lost Dutchman era, perhaps you could initiate such a thread yourself.
I,for one,would be happy to contribute whatever I could to such a conversation. I would also be willing, as moderator, to ensure that the discourse remains both civil and on topic.
Regards:Wayne