Stone Maps Clarence Mitchell and MOEL

Moderator: somehiker

Post Reply
StevenTrost
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 9:17 am
anti-spam detector: No
The middle number please (4): 4

Stone Maps Clarence Mitchell and MOEL

Post by StevenTrost » Sat Jun 06, 2015 2:45 pm

Stone Maps MOEL
Last edited by StevenTrost on Tue Aug 04, 2015 9:20 am, edited 5 times in total.

somehiker
Posts: 694
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:51 pm
anti-spam detector: No
The middle number please (4): 4

Re: Stone Maps Clarence Mitchell and MOEL

Post by somehiker » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:15 pm

Thanks for posting Matthew's article Steven.
And thanks for sharing the results of your research Matthew.
This information should help to clear up some of the misinformation surrounding the modern history of the stones, and I'm looking forward to part 2.

Regards:SH.

User avatar
deducer
Posts: 80
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 8:58 am
anti-spam detector: No
The middle number please (4): 4

Re: Stone Maps Clarence Mitchell and MOEL

Post by deducer » Sun Jun 07, 2015 3:04 am

Me too. This is a very informative article. Looking forward to part 2.

somehiker
Posts: 694
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:51 pm
anti-spam detector: No
The middle number please (4): 4

Re: Stone Maps Clarence Mitchell and MOEL

Post by somehiker » Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:46 am

I'll be interested in learning how,exactly and by whom, the set of four stones came into the possession of the Flagg Foundation. That process is still unclear, especially since there seems to be no evidence of a court or other official order. Mike M. had reported some time back, that two sets of stones....one set original, and one of stone copies...existed in that time frame. That Mitchell had caved in to the others demands by giving them two copied stones and two originals, which makes some sense to me.

Regards:SH.

somehiker
Posts: 694
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:51 pm
anti-spam detector: No
The middle number please (4): 4

Re: Stone Maps Clarence Mitchell and MOEL

Post by somehiker » Thu Jun 11, 2015 5:42 pm

StevenTrost wrote:Unfortunately this posted article has been requested to be removed because of copyright issues.
Well, so much for that :? :roll:

Post Reply