Change font size


Post a new topicPost a reply Page 1 of 3   [ 29 posts ]
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Are we over protecting our resources?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:48 pm 

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:46 pm
Posts: 40
Interesting stats, Everything, Every resource, every job, every
dollar running out of the country.

[url="http://www.humanevents.com/search.php?author_name=Human+Events"]Human Events[/url]

11/02/2009

The United States has largest energy reserves on Earth, according to a [url="http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=f7bd7b77-ba50-48c2-a635-220d7cf8c519"]report[/url] from the Congressional Research Service.

As shown in the charts below, the U.S. has 1,321 billion barrels of oil (or barrels of oil equivalent for other sources of energy) when combining its recoverable natural gas, oil and coal reserves.

While Russia is a close second with 1,248 billion barrels, other energy producing nations are far behind. No. 3 is Saudi Arabia (543 billion barrels), followed by China (494 billion barrels), Iran (426 billion barrels) and Canada (221 billion barrels.)

"Our overwhelming coal, natural gas, and oil resources represent tens of trillions of dollars in wealth and millions of American jobs,” said Sen. James Inhofe (R.-Ok.), who, along with Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R.-Alaska), released the report last week. “Whether through decree or purposeful inaction, government policies that unnecessarily restrict or prevent our ability to responsibly produce these domestic resources are threatening, and could eventually undermine, our nation's economic and national security. We should pursue an all-of-the-above strategy that advances new energy technologies but also prioritizes developing the resources we have today."

The report also noted that the United States has 28% of all the world’s coal reserves, with Russia again coming in second with 19%.

In addition, the report stated that the United States has tapped into only 13% or 21 billion barrels of its oil reserves, with the other 87% still untouched.

The following charts show the true picture of America’s energy reserves:

Image


Image


Image[/QUOTE]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we over protecting our resources?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 5:33 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 2:35 pm
Posts: 277
It really does make you wonder what direction the current administration and enviro nazis want to take our country in. What do you think about that Hope and Change now?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we over protecting our resources?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:02 pm 

Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 1:56 am
Posts: 481
Human Events (the website Waynno linked to above) put out a list of Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th and 20th Centuries[3]:

The Communist Manifesto, by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels
Mein Kampf, by Adolf Hitler
Quotations from Chairman Mao Zedong, by Mao Zedong
Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, by Alfred Kinsey
Democracy and Education, by John Dewey
Das Kapital, by Karl Marx
The Feminine Mystique, by Betty Friedan
The Course of Positive Philosophy, by Auguste Comte
Beyond Good and Evil, by Friedrich Nietzsche
General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, by John Maynard Keynes
Twenty books received honorable mention, including The Origin of Species, by Charles Darwin, and Silent Spring, by Rachel Carson.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we over protecting our resources?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:52 pm 

Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:43 am
Posts: 212
Sal, what's the point of your last post???

Brew


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we over protecting our resources?
PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:12 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 2:35 pm
Posts: 277
Brew wrote:
Sal, what's the point of your last post???

Brew



Has Sally ever needed a point for posting? Sally's really just a loose cannon taking pot shots at what ever. I'm not sure even Sally could give you the point of his/her postings.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we over protecting our resources?
PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:46 am 

Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 1:56 am
Posts: 481
let me spell it out for you. If the above website thinks that Darwin's "Origin of Species" and Friedan's "Feminine Mystique" were two of the most Harmful Books of the 19th and 20th centuries, what does that tell you about their ability to be rational about anything else?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we over protecting our resources?
PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:17 am 

Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 6:45 pm
Posts: 184
Sal says...
Quote:
Human Events (the website Waynno linked to above) put out a list of Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th and 20th Centuries

The Communist Manifesto, by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels
Mein Kampf, by Adolf Hitler
Quotations from Chairman Mao Zedong, by Mao Zedong
Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, by Alfred Kinsey
Democracy and Education, by John Dewey
Das Kapital, by Karl Marx
The Feminine Mystique, by Betty Friedan
The Course of Positive Philosophy, by Auguste Comte
Beyond Good and Evil, by Friedrich Nietzsche
General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, by John Maynard Keynes
Twenty books received honorable mention, including The Origin of Species, by Charles Darwin, and Silent Spring, by Rachel Carson.


I suppose Sal thinks the writings of Hitler and Marx are getting a bad rap by being listed as dangerous too. Interestingly enough, the philosophies of Hitler, Marx and perhaps Sal would call for the banning of this conservative periodical and order its editorials burned for daring to criticize. But then, that would confirm the validity of the criticism wouldn’t it?

Rather than attacking the messenger Sal, you’d be wise to determine if the message is true. Are Waynno’s statistics accurate or not? That’s more important and should be the point!

And...
Quote:
let me spell it out for you. If the above website thinks that Darwin's "Origin of Species" and Friedan's "Feminine Mystique" were two of the most Harmful Books of the 19th and 20th centuries, what does that tell you about their ability to be rational about anything else?


Note that Darwin only got honorable mention Sal. It’s YOUR reporting that seems to take liberties. LOL


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we over protecting our resources?
PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:34 pm 

Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 1:56 am
Posts: 481
Quote:
Are Waynno’s statistics accurate or not?


How can we be sure of any statistics? We need to trust the reporter of the statistics. For every report like the above we can point to an equal number that suggests that most recoverable domestic fossil fuel products have already been harvested. It's also been reported that ALL of the earth's recoverable petroleum will be used up by the end of this century at the current rate of use.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we over protecting our resources?
PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:06 pm 

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:46 pm
Posts: 40
Whats your take on Nuclear development sal? Or maybe plant
some windmills next to your house to blow those pesky bikes and
quads out of there.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Are we over protecting our resources?
PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:11 pm 

Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 6:45 pm
Posts: 184
That one's over my head sal. First you say, "We need to trust the reporter of the statistics." then you say there are conflicting reports! So what's a girl to do?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post a new topicPost a reply Page 1 of 3   [ 29 posts ]
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
610nm Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net