lara wrote:
Arena wrote:
Say, do they have to have handicapped access to the crater? This sounds like a potential lawsuit....?
there are many potential ADA lawsuits on blm and nps land. and why do we call it land owned by the national park service. dang it, WE own the land. but i digress.

we need lawyers that are willing to take ADA laws seriously, but i am afraid there isn't much money in those.
Lara, Great points made! I have been saying similar sentiments for a year now, about desert access in general. When they close an area off to vehicular usage, it prevents many disabled and elderly folks from seeing the better and more scenic parts of the desert. Carrying adequate amounts of water in order to hike the vast areas, is difficult at the least, and prohibitive as well. Many parts of the desert will be then, inaccessible. Plain and simple. One can only carry a very limited amount of water at the 8.32 pounds it weighs per gallon.
I realize that measures must be taken to help preserve the desert for future generations, this obvious. A lot of beautiful areas are close to being ruined. On the flip side, it must be considered that many areas are public land, therefore owned by we citizens of the USA. A perplexing and complicated dichotomy to say the least.