The Sterling Legend - By Estee Conatser

Moderator: Jim_b

User avatar
cubfan64
Posts: 686
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:00 am
anti-spam detector: No
The middle number please (4): 4

Re: The Sterling Legend - By Estee Conatser

Post by cubfan64 »

I guess I don't interpret it the same way you do Ashton. While I agree that the description in Conatser consists of both a tunnel (which is what Waltz defines as THE MINE) and a shaft above, I interpret it to mean that the shaft above leads to the same gold.

I highlighted in red the word that is the key to my interpretation...

"Some distance above the tunnel on the side of the mountain, is a shaft or incline that is so steep that one cannot climb down. This, too, is carefully covered. The shaft goes right down in the midst of the rich gold ledge, where it can be picked off in flakes of almost pure gold.”

Because it says THE, I interpret that to be describing the same gold is that which is located in the mine - if not, I believe it would have been written as "a" rich gold ledge.

What is really interesting to me is that no matter whether the shaft and tunnel are both leading to the same gold source or not, it implies that there is both a large and rich source of gold out there somewhere. It states that "some distance" above the tunnel is the shaft - I suppose everyone has a different interpretation of some distance, but as it's written, I envision it to be more than just a quick climb. That means to me that either the shaft/incline is really deep in order to intersect the gold in the tunnel, or the gold source happens to be fairly wide and runs at a certain angle such that it can be intersected by both the tunnel and shaft.

I'm rambling now and not making much sense, but I hope you understand how I interpret it.
User avatar
AshtonPage
Posts: 368
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 6:37 pm
anti-spam detector: No
The middle number please (4): 4
Location: Sunny Portland, Oregon

Re: The Sterling Legend - By Estee Conatser

Post by AshtonPage »

Hi Roc,

I agree with Cubfan that from the way it is written, the shaft and the tunnel are not connected and are two separate entities. I would assume (from the way it is written) that they are what I would call a considerable distance apart…….. whatever a considerable distance is.

Cubfan,

Interesting point, both the shaft and the tunnel might go to the same vein. If so, then there should be mucho-oro between the shaft and the tunnel.
I’m still intrigued by the fact (if you could call it that) that Julia apparently mentioned to Bricknell (?) that Waltz spoke of a tunnel that went to the richest mine and also a shaft that went to a gold ledge. Two distinct mines. This begs the question, are there two LDM’s that Waltz knew about and possibly mined?

It just keeps getting more interesting. Thanks for your input guys – that’s why I’m here.

Best,
Ashton
Post Reply